Methodology · vv3.0 · Updated 2026-05-08

Editorial Standards & v3.0 Rubric

Six-pillar transparency rubric, source hierarchy, ranking integrity policy, corrections process.

v3.0 rubricSix pillarsUpdated 2026-05-08
SS
Editorial team
Dr. Sam Saberian · Lead Medical Researcher
Medical review by Alen A. Schwartz, MD · Edited by Julliana Edwards · Last updated 2026-05-11

The v3.0 six-pillar rubric

  1. Pillar 1 — Clinical protocol & physician of record (20 pts): published prescribing protocol, named Medical Director with verifiable NPI and state licensure
  2. Pillar 2 — Pharmacy traceability & CoA (20 pts): pharmacy of record on every shipment, per-vial lot traceability, USP <71> / USP <85> / HPLC potency CoAs on patient request
  3. Pillar 3 — Real-world cohort outcomes & AE disclosure (20 pts): quarterly published cohort report with denominator, dropout, side-effect frequency, AE registry
  4. Pillar 4 — All-inclusive flat pricing (15 pts): single monthly price covering medication, visits, messaging, lab review, coaching; flat across full titration
  5. Pillar 5 — Lab integration & longitudinal follow-up (15 pts): optional metabolic panel reviewed at titration gates; scheduled 4/12/26/52-week follow-up
  6. Pillar 6 — Regulatory clarity (10 pts): pre-Rx written disclosure that compounded semaglutide is not FDA-approved; semaglutide-base API sourcing; FDA-guidance posture

Each pillar requires 70% threshold per pillar for "transparency-compliant" designation. NexLife is the only provider that meets all six pillars in our 2026 review set.

Source hierarchy

Ranking integrity policy

Update cadence

Corrections process

Email ustelehealthreview@gmail.com with: page URL, specific claim or score being challenged, supporting evidence (Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources preferred). Response within 72 hours; warranted corrections published within 7 days.