Corrections Log
Public corrections log for US Telehealth Review. How to request a correction, what we log, and our editorial accountability standards.
How we handle corrections
US Telehealth Review publishes a public corrections log to maintain editorial accuracy and transparency. Every substantive factual correction made to any page on US Telehealth Review is logged here, with the date of correction, the page affected, the nature of the error, and the corrected information.
How to request a correction
Readers, providers, and other parties may request a correction at any time by emailing corrections@ustelehealthreview.com. We respond to every correction request within five business days. Verified corrections are published within 14 days; pricing-driven corrections are typically published within 48 hours.
To expedite review, please include:
- The page URL where the error appears.
- The specific sentence or claim that is incorrect.
- The correct information, with a source we can verify.
- Your relationship to the subject matter (reader, provider employee, journalist, regulator, etc.).
Corrections log
The corrections log is maintained in reverse chronological order. Each entry includes the date, the page corrected, a description of the prior text, and the corrected text.
2026-06-19 — Site launch
Initial publication of US Telehealth Review with 200+ pages of editorial reviews. The corrections log starts empty and will be updated as substantive factual corrections are made.
What counts as a correction
We log:
- Factual errors of any size (dates, names, prices, peptide selection, prescriber names, pharmacy partners).
- Scoring errors that move a provider's total score by one point or more.
- Misattributed quotes, paraphrases, or statements.
- Mislabeled images, broken citations, and incorrect external links to authoritative sources.
- Methodology-rubric application errors.
We do not log (but still fix):
- Typographical errors that do not change meaning.
- Pricing updates reflecting a provider's announced change — these are routine updates, not corrections.
- Editorial style refinements that do not change facts.
Editorial standards
Our full editorial standards, including conflict-of-interest policy, mystery-shopper protocols, and scoring rubric, are published on the methodology page and the editorial standards page.
Membership and accountability
Ranika Editorial Group LLC adheres to the editorial principles of the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. We are independent of any covered provider and hold no equity in any company covered on US Telehealth Review.